The Impersonal approach

Last week I had a very interesting chat with a start-up founder on the various pros and cons of PR and the role comms plays (or indeed, perhaps doesn't play) in a start-up business. One comment particularly stuck, being that he had received around 15 unsolicited approaches from PR agencies in the last year, none of which were either personal or considered, and would fall quite happily under the 'spam' bracket.

Now the PR industry has collectively been blindly throwing ideas at journalists and bloggers without first checking if the idea is relevant, timely, or even vaguely of interest, for decades. For an industry so symbiotic with that of the media, we do a great job of winding them up.

However, it seems this same approach is still inherent in many approaches to potential clients as well - why is something so crucial as new business being approached so haphazardly?

Impersonal approach

Is it because the guy I talked to was a start-up? Is there an assumption that he doesn't know better? The day after we met, he sent me a typical example and it beggared belief. I won't reprint it here, nor name the agency, but it basically said:

"Chris,

Want an [insert improbable statistic] return on your PR investment?"

It then linked to a youtube video, and finished. No email sign off, just the signature. One sentence (poorly phrased), and that was it. It didn't even say 'hello'.

No context, no understanding, no consideration. Now, why on God's clean earth would a business owner think 'wow, these guys should handle my communications strategy' if you can't be bothered to communicate properly in the first place?

The founder had told me the day before that the PR industry is not valued among his peers - indeed, we're well below lawyers for value for money, and mostly seen as mercenary and full of guff.

Statements such as the "guaranteed 300% return on investment" included in the World's Shortest Pitch don't exactly add credibility to the industry - and I'm not certain, but I'd bet this waffle statistic is based on the archaic AVE, which is a rant waiting to happen…

It's massively frustrating when you hear journalist on a weekly, (if not daily), basis venting spleen on twitter about impersonal pitches ('Dear Insert Wrong Name Here'); and blatant email mail merges ('Dear Editor', 'Dear XXXX' et al.) proving just how much the PR cares about who they're emailing.

When you see it done as a new business pitch the day after hearing that the founder of a very exciting business sees PR as uncaring and just after money, it makes you slightly angry.

Seriously, we're the communications industry - can we not 'communicate'?

Chris @wonky_donky


Bookmark and Share
 /

3 comments for “The Impersonal approach”

  1. Posted 24 April 2012 at 13:09:55

    I wouldn't disagree with this Chris - the email (and approach) is shocking. But do wonder if there is any other industry that beats itself up as much as PR?
    My Twitter feed seems chocca at the minute with journos tweeting 'PR: Interested in story x? Me: why the f*** would I be interested in that, you tawdry piece of sh*t?'
    Seeing as the rest of the world views us as either incompetent, immoral, vacuous or all three, maybe we should stick together a bit more?

  2. Posted 24 April 2012 at 13:15:27

    PS - realised that had sod-all to do with your original blog and I wasn't implying you were some kind of PR turncoat :)
    It was a rant looking for a home

  3. Posted 27 April 2012 at 11:26:16

    hey Paul,

    I think you have a point about beating ourselves up - although it is defintiely exacerbated by us being pillioried or outed so often by the media for our mistakes, which forces us onto the defensive.

    This is of course a whole new rant in itself - the one way traffic between PRs being fair game for media to whinge about, but woe betide the PRs have a pop at poor journalism or rudeness!

    Chris

Post a comment