<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper"><channel><title>blog</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net</link><pubDate></pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>blog</description><language>en</language><item><title>A BIG boost for tech innovation</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/2/a-big-boost-for-tech-innovation.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/2/a-big-boost-for-tech-innovation.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Last night, the Octopus team proudly joined client Cisco
to launch the British Innovation Gateway (BIG) Awards 2012, an open
innovation competition to discover and reward the finest examples
of the UK's most innovative start-up digital businesses and
SMEs.&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p>We were joined by the great and good of the UK's tech, creative
and digital industries, as well as Cisco's global CTO, Padmasree
Warrior (<a
href="https://twitter.com/#!/Padmasree">@Padmasree</a>), who has
over 1.4m followers on Twitter. Puts my 204 to shame :(.</p>

<p>The awards, which run from 1 February - September 2012, form the
latest stage in Cisco's BIG initiative (<a
href="http://www.ciscobig.co.uk/">www.CiscoBIG.co.uk</a>), a
significant five year investment of cash, technology and human
resources, which aims to develop Britain's innovation eco-system
and create an environment in which start-up digital businesses and
their ideas can flourish.</p>

<p>Open to individuals, groups of individuals and legal entities in
the UK, applicants can enter their technology concept or prototype
into one of five categories, including 'Future Cities' and
'Internet of Things'. The overall&nbsp;winner will receive a total
prize package of $200k, made up of cash, mentoring, digital
marketing, public relations and legal services.</p>

<p>As a business, we are thrilled to be an official partner of the
Awards - alongside JP Morgan, Bird &amp; Bird and DNX - as
innovation and technology are at the heart of so much of what we do
at Octopus.&nbsp; Members of our team will sit on the judging
panel, and we can't wait to see some of the amazing and creative
concepts that the entrants come up with.&nbsp;We're also excited at
the opportunity to work with the winners, who will receive
extensive PR support and a dedicated PR Programme as part of their
prize.</p>

<p>For more information on the BIG Awards, please go to <a
href="http://www.thebigawards.co.uk/">www.theBIGAwards.co.uk</a>.&nbsp;
Entries close on 31 March 2012.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong><em>Laura</em></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/19023/big awards_379x252.jpg"  width="379"  height="252" alt="BIG awards big"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A presentation revelation!</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/2/a-presentation-revelation!.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/2/a-presentation-revelation!.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Having been agency-side of the PR game for the last 14
years, I have seen - and participated in - my fair share of
PowerPoint presentations. I've sat in endless meetings, debating
the best order for slide decks, rehearsed pitch presentations,
searched ClipArt folders for the perfect image and agonised over
the most impactful slide build.&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p>But last night, something revelatory happened.&nbsp;I witnessed
for the first time a new and exciting way to pitch ideas and
concepts: Pecha Kucha.&nbsp;Never heard of it?&nbsp;Me neither, so
here's a quick summary (courtesy of <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecha_Kucha">Wikipedia</a>):</p>

<p><strong>Pecha Kucha</strong>&nbsp;(<a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_language"
title="Japanese language">Japanese</a>:&nbsp;ペチャクチャ,&nbsp;IPA:&nbsp;<a
 href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_Japanese"
title="Wikipedia:IPA for Japanese">[petɕa ku͍̥tɕa]</a>,<a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecha_Kucha#cite_note-0">[1]</a>&nbsp;<em>
chit-chat</em>) is a presentation methodology in which 20 slides
are shown for 20 seconds each, usually seen in a multiple-speaker
event called a Pecha Kucha Night (PKN).&nbsp;The presenter has no
control of his/her presentation, and the slides automatically
change every 20 seconds, typically resulting in an exciting,
fast-paced and highly engaging event.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/19000/pecha-kucha_263x175.jpg"  width="263"  height="175" alt="Pecha Kucha"/></p>

<p>At last night's launch of Cisco's British Innovation Gateway
Awards 2012 (more on that in a later blog post), a number of
Britain's up and coming entrepreneurs were invited to Ravensbourne
College to present - Pecha Kucha style - to members of the tech,
creative and start-up community.&nbsp;The presentations ranged from
an <a href="https://leemail.me/">email solution</a> that allows you
to 'switch off' email from selected senders, to a <a
href="http://www.portalentertainment.co.uk/">storytelling
platform</a> where the direction of the story changes depending on
the viewer's anxiety levels.</p>

<p>The presenters did an amazing job - gone were the usual agenda
slides, company credentials and lame animations.&nbsp;The Pecha
Kucha approach meant that each pitch was creatively delivered,
replacing written content with lots of interesting imagery to help
convey key points.&nbsp;The result was fun, engaging and really
gave you a sense of the company's personality.&nbsp;The whole room
was mesmerised - not just by the cool concepts and ideas, but by
the ability of these start-ups to present such a compelling case
for their businesses.&nbsp;</p>

<p>So the challenge now is to take what we learnt at Ravensbourne
and apply it to our own presentations - I'll admit, it's a bit of a
scary concept (that 30 slide PowerPoint acts as a bit of a comfort
blanket as you head into a pitch) but I think we're brave enough to
make the leap. So I'll just apologise now if in the coming weeks
you can't get hold of me, or I'm a little slow at getting back to
you - it's because I'll be at Ravensbourne, learning the art of
Pecha Kucha from the best of Britain's future tech
talent.&nbsp;Fancy joining me?</p>

<p><strong><em>Laura</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>United to the end as Fortune favours brave Octopedes</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/1/united-to-the-end-as-fortune-favours-brave-octopedes.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:58:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/2/1/united-to-the-end-as-fortune-favours-brave-octopedes.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>In face of sub-zero temperatures, Octopus United rallied
late to hold on to the top spot after a frosty encounter against a
strong <em>Do It Like A Dude</em> outfit in the Slough Power
League.</strong></p>

<p>This week's encounter began at frenetic pace with plenty of
early touches for Octopus, and especially for Jack Harris who saw
plenty of the ball early on. Though unfortunately at both ends of
the pitch!</p>

<p>Having scored the opener, seizing upon a through ball from
United's ever-present captain Tommy Flisher, Harris then
embarrassingly levelled up the tie putting through his own goal.
Looking to make amends for his error, Jack then drilled home from
distance to restore Octopus' lead.</p>

<p>This lead was extended before half time with a further five
goals, with Flisher, Harris, Steve Miller and Sammy Jamieson (2)
sharing the spoils, and only conceding two goals in response.</p>

<p>With a flattering 7-3 advantage at half time, Octopus knew the
<em>Dudes</em> would be out to raise their game in the second half,
and raise it they did. Despite many a strong tackle from Sammy,
Steve Spencer and Tom Holland at the back, United let their 4 goal
cushion slip and allowed the <em>Dudes</em> to level the game with
time running out.</p>

<p>Desperately seeking inspiration, out of nowhere, Tommy&nbsp;"The
Wily Mouse" Flisher slammed in a superb finish across the keeper
from a wide angle.&nbsp;Moments later, he again showed all his
5-a-side knowhow in supplying Harris with a sneaky free kick to put
the Octopedes back in front with minutes to spare. Calmness then
prevailed as Octopus ran down the clock and came out relieved 9-7
winners to remain clear at the top of the table.</p>

<p>In other news, Octopus' wheeler-and-dealer approach came up
trumps in the transfer market with the recruitment of free agent
Callum Fortune before the window was slammed shut on Tuesday.</p>

<p>Along with the welcome return of JP Charles, Fortune will be in
contention for an immediate debut with a call up to next week's
squad.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, Julian Moore's long-awaited return from the
injury list has been set back by another week, as Octopus seek
assurances that he has fully recovered from the Achilles injury
that has plagued his career.</p>

<p><strong><em>Jack, as commentator.</em></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18978/oct utd league table.png" width="315" height="307" alt="Oct utd table"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Have your cake, but don’t eat it</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/30/have-your-cake,-but-don’t-eat-it.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:42:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/30/have-your-cake,-but-don’t-eat-it.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>As a newcomer to the Octopus blog, I've had to have a
good think about what to write about.</strong></p>

<p>Something cerebral to impress my new colleagues? Something to do
with PR, to show how in tune I am with the news agenda? A summary
of my first few days? Or maybe something completely off the
wall?</p>

<p>Well, it's Monday and I'm not sure I can do cerebral quite yet -
so forget that.</p>

<p>A look through the news shows that there is plenty to talk about
and analyse from a PR perspective:</p>

<p>-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The
Hester bonus debate</p>

<p>-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Tube
workers rejecting an Olympics bonus</p>

<p>-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The
ongoing issue of racism in football</p>

<p>I was going to pick one of these, but a scan through the morning
news shows that there's probably been enough <a
href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cd213398-48f6-11e1-974a-00144feabdc0.html">
written</a> and said about these issues without me sticking my oar
in. To summarise though, on Hester - the banks need to make a
better case about their very real worth to the public; on the tube
story - give over; on racism in football - kick it out messages
don't really mean much unless harsher bans for players and fans are
brought in. Let's <em>really</em> kick it out please, along with
Sepp Blatter.</p>

<p>So that's the news dealt with, and if I was to sum up my first
few days, I'd say 'new business' and 'really great fun'.</p>

<p>So that just leaves "off the wall", I guess, and one thing for
me to talk about. Cake.</p>

<p>Apparently every newcomer to Octopus has to bake a cake for the
rest of the office. I've taken a look at some of the previous
attempts, and there are some professional looking creations in
there. In fact, without wanting to cast aspersions on my new
colleagues, I'm questioning whether some form of cheating may have
occurred.</p>

<p>It seems cake baking and cake consumption are serious matters
around these parts. And with my culinary genius stretching to beans
on toast, it's fair to say I'm a tad anxious. I've not been
nominated yet, but when my turn comes round, I'll be coming over
all Stephen Hester and wanting the attention to just go away. Any
ideas for recipes gratefully received. Please.</p>

<p><em><strong>James</strong></em></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18929/cake.jpg" width="335" height="252" alt="Cake"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Octopus Utd winning streak continues</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/25/the-octopus-utd-winning-streak-continues.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:32:27 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/25/the-octopus-utd-winning-streak-continues.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Octopus United continued their impressive start to the
season with another comfortable victory in the Slough Power
League.</strong></p>

<p>This week's game against WMC started off slow and both teams
cancelled each other out with long-range efforts. However, Octopus
Utd seized an advantage with Captain Tom Flisher bagging the opener
with a clinical finish inside 10 minutes.</p>

<p>From then on Octopus controlled the game and goals from Steve
Miller, Sammy Jamieson and JP Charles saw the team take a 6-2 lead
at half-time.</p>

<p>Octopus picked-up the pace in the second half, with early goals
from Sammy and Tom. With a comfortable goal cushion Octopus played
some good free-flowing football and ended up winning 13-2.
&nbsp;</p>

<p>January has been a good month for the team, who have notched up
three consecutive wins and are now top of their league.</p>

<p>Octopus will look to continue their good form next week, and
with Julian Moore still on the long-term injury list, the team may
give a debut to January signing, James Pieslak.</p>

<p><strong><em>JP</em></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18901/octutd.png" width="309" height="306" alt="Octopus UTD"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Fail chasing</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/23/fail-chasing.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:10:29 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/23/fail-chasing.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Sure everyone's aware of the Snickers story doing the
rounds at the mo. But just in case here's the gist: Snickers 'hack'
a celeb's Twitter profile posting Tweets that appear to be
incongruous with that user's house style.</strong></p>

<p>Jordan, for example, Tweeted that Chinese leaders are likely to
loosen monetary policy to stimulate growth. A few other
surprisingly fiscally-minded Tweets followed, before a Twitpic
popped up with said celeb holding a Snickers with the tagline
'you're not you when you're hungry'.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18875/jordansnickers_256x192.jpg"  width="256"  height="192" alt="Jordan Snickers"/></p>

<p>The bit that's confusing me is why this campaign is being
positioned as a fail or backfire by some in the digital media. One
(fairly spurious) reason being that it's insulting to Jordan. Well,
I'm sure she's dead pleased that the digital media is mobilising to
support her - but she shouldn't be surprised - such has been the
unflinching nature of their support for her and her work in recent
years. Further, if Jordan is in on the joke then why is it a
problem? Surely they're not concerned that Jordan is... *gasp*
...being manipulated at the hands of Snickers? Poor, naive, non
media-savvy individual that she is.</p>

<p>Anyway, let's be real; Jordan doesn't generally tweet about the
fiscal policies of the world's super powers, and that doesn't
necessarily make her stupid. Which is the point of the joke.</p>

<p>It seems to me that this is more about a 'Fail' story being more
interesting than a success story, than it is about providing a
genuine insight on a brand campaign. I have noticed this more and
more in the digital media recently, this desire to chase the fail,
over-analysing campaigns to urgently seek out the most negative
stance. I understand that analysis is what they do, but let's not
forget that the average consumer won't be arsed to dig that deep
(and who can blame them?).</p>

<p>Snickers should be applauded for doing something a bit
different, and for successfully causing buzz about their brand -
something which is mentioned in an irony free manner by many of the
articles I have read. Moreover, as far as I can see, the only real
negative buzz is that which has been created by the media.</p>

<p>Maybe it's an overly personal viewpoint, but I just don't like
brands that have stuck their necks out being run down in the media
for doing so. Let's save that for agencies that send dead goldfish
to the media or whatever.</p>

<p>NB: As far as Octopus is concerned you won't be seeing our
Twitter handle posting or RTing any 'Fail' stories</p>

<p><strong><em>Tommy</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A new start on new habits... </title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/5/a-new-start-on-new-habits-.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:36:39 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2012/1/5/a-new-start-on-new-habits-.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>When January 1<sup>st</sup> hits, you almost feel forced
into making New Year's resolutions. And they are always the same
ones; eat healthier, go to the gym, stop smoking. Most people
resent making resolutions as it can feel like you are setting
yourself up for failure. How realistic is it to eat healthily for
the entire year?! You are bound to fall off the wagon at some
point.</strong></p>

<p>However, in business it can be very different, and creating
resolutions - or goals if you wish - for the year ahead can be
quite refreshing. You can sit back and reflect on the past year,
look at what worked and what didn't, and make resolutions based on
what will make your company even better.</p>

<p>So here <a
href="https://twitter.com/#!/octopuscomms">@OctopusComms</a>, we
got together to discuss what we would like to achieve or do more of
this year, and have pulled together our list of resolutions for
making 2012 an even better year.</p>

<p><strong>1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong>
<strong>Network more</strong></p>

<p>As PR professionals, we all know that contacts are key. You
never know, that person you were wowing with your
oh-so-witty-and-intelligent conversation at the pub last night
could turn out to be a golden connection for you in the future.
There's potential business relationships and partnerships to be
made in so many places, and you can never have enough friends, so
one resolution that we fully intend to keep in 2012 is to get out
there and get networking. We'll regularly be showing our faces at
industry, client and social events throughout the year, and we
can't wait to see you there!</p>

<p><strong>2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong> <strong>Expand
our business</strong></p>

<p>This year we want to expand our client base by going after yet
more new business, winning exciting clients in new, exciting
spaces. All while keeping our lovely current clients happy of
course! As new technology emerges - and consumer and business
trends change - we want to stay ahead of the curve and work with
clients in these new spaces. We also want to apply what we learn to
our existing clients to keep them ahead of their competitors.</p>

<p><strong>3)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong> <strong>Spend
more time with journalists</strong></p>

<p>We talk to them day in, day out, we know what issues and topics
excite them and when they need to file their story. But we want to
get to know them even better, preferably over a beer or two. This
year we are each tasking ourselves with taking at least five key
media contacts (whether national, broadcast, trade, consumer or
blogger) out for a drink to learn more about what interests them,
both in and out of work. This will help us develop even closer
relationships and ensure we are always getting it right. Times
change and journalists move on, so this knowledge will help us stay
ahead of the game and continue to stay relevant to the journalists
we work with.</p>

<p><strong>4)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong> <strong>Better
utilise social media channels</strong></p>

<p>Social media is something we can't live without, and in 2011 we
saw more and more journalists using social platforms, like Twitter,
to connect with brands. So this year, we are aiming to better
utilise these channels to make the journalist pitching process a
whole lot more informal (not to mention a darn sight shorter!).
Using a neat little 140 characters instead of a long-winded email
or a dreaded follow-up phone call has proved very successful, and
we'll be trying our utmost to do it more this year.</p>

<p><strong>5)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong> <strong>We
will put our hands up for 2012</strong></p>

<p>It's safe to say we have had some stonking brand buddies and
celeb link ups in recent years. Everyone from Amanda Holden and
Colin Jackson, to Theo Paphitis and The Prime Minister(!) have
helped us to tell our clients' stories to the rest of the world.
Finding fame with our various London 2012 campaigns and exciting
charity work with organisations like Comic Relief (we've even had
lunch at the House of Commons), it's difficult to think of how we
can top all we've achieved so far. But this year we have decided to
work extra hard, setting our sights even higher, yes higher than
working with David Cameron! &nbsp;After all, we only have 'one
shot' to bag the ultimate of celebrity endorsements.</p>

<p>Aston, Oriche, Marvin and JB, if you're reading this (and why
wouldn't you be?!), we put our hands up!</p>

<p>They say that old habits die hard, but in this case its new
habits made great.</p>

<p>Here's for an exciting 2012.</p>

<p><strong><em>Jen and the team at Octopus Comms</em></strong></p>

<p><strong><em>&nbsp;</em></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18849/jls_388x259.jpg"  width="388"  height="259" alt="JLS"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Not the best use of your PR budget... but not news either</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/12/9/not-the-best-use-of-your-pr-budget-but-not-news-either.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:22:36 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/12/9/not-the-best-use-of-your-pr-budget-but-not-news-either.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Unless you've spent this week hiding in a cave
or</strong> <a
href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-15842559"><strong>
trapped in a clothes horse</strong></a><strong>, the chances are
that you'll have seen The Independent's series of front page
"scoops" exposing PR behemoth Bell Pottinger.</strong></p>

<p>Now there isn't time to go into all the whys and wherefores of
each of these stories. But a couple of things struck us today at
Octopus Towers after reading <a
href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/wikipedia-founder-attacks-bell-pottinger-for-ethical-blindness-6273836.html">
this piece</a> on Bell Pottinger's track record of editing clients'
Wikipedia pages.</p>

<p><strong>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong>
<strong>What's the big deal?</strong></p>

<p>So some PR people have been paid to amend some facts on their
clients' Wikipedia pages. So what? That's hardly PR at its best but
surely the whole point of Wikipedia's self-policing system is that
it is, well, self-policing. You probably won't get away with making
things up. And there seems to be no evidence that anyone at Bell
Pottinger added anything untrue. And as long as it's true and has
been referenced according to Wikipedia's own rules and <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmabel/PR">guidelines on
how PR people should use the site</a>, what's the big deal? I mean,
everyone knows that you should take everything you read on
Wikipedia with a pinch of salt.</p>

<p>Which leads me on to point two...</p>

<p><strong>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong>
<strong>You should take everything you read on Wikipedia with a
pinch of salt</strong></p>

<p>Any GCSE history student will tell you that you need to consider
who your source of information is when deciding what to believe.
Whether intentional or not, everyone has some inherent biases and
no one can be 100% trustworthy. Given that Wikipedia is written by
thousands of people that we don't know, it's only sensible to treat
any information you get from it with a bit of caution, whether it
is from a paid PR person, an angry blogger or just someone who
happens to be really interested in snails/mushrooms/the back
catalogue of The Small Faces. In fact, the nature of the industry
means that a paid PR person is probably the least likely of those
people to include things that haven't been independently
verified.</p>

<p>Which brings me on to point three... (see how this works?)</p>

<p><strong>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong>
<strong>PR people are not, I repeat not, the devil</strong></p>

<p>The very fact that The Independent thinks this story is worthy
of space in its newspaper is a worrying sign of how PR people in
the UK are perceived: as shadowy, amoral and Basically A Bad Thing.
Now, like any industry, I'm sure PR has its share of dodgy people
and organisations. But for the most part, PR exists because a lot
of companies and organisations are not very good at talking about
themselves and want some help in doing just that. Maybe as an
industry we need to start telling people that more often and much
more loudly in order to combat this image of nefarious
ne'er-do-wells that has somehow become the stereotype.</p>

<p>(Disclaimer: I've never edited a Wikipedia page. Not for a
client and <em>definitely</em> not for my own personal
pleasure.&nbsp; Neither have I met anyone from, or claiming to be
from, an oppressive regime in the former soviet union. And I do not
know Prince Andrew.)</p>

<p><strong><em>Phil</em></strong></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/media/18831/wikipedia_442x354.jpg"  width="442"  height="354" alt="Wikipedia"/></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Tell me what you want</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/11/30/tell-me-what-you-want.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:45:56 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/11/30/tell-me-what-you-want.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>Clichés, as we all know, should be avoided like the
plague. The same could be said for sweeping generalisations, let's
face it they are all supremely unhelpful.</strong></p>

<p>One that never seems to want to lie down and die is the one
about how men ought to be able to second-guess what their
wives/partners want without ever being explicitly told - the "if
you don't know, I won't tell you" thing.</p>

<p>I'll neatly sidestep the extent to which I find this outlook
depressing. But as an illustration of the potential for damage this
attitude has, let's transpose it into a scenario more familiar with
those of us who work in PR and comms… client/agency
relationships.</p>

<p>We all know how it goes. You win the account, you put together a
plan and away you go.</p>

<p>At some point you sit down with the client to review progress.
You know in your heart-of-hearts whether you've been working hard
enough or not - you don't need numbers to tell you that.</p>

<p>But this is where it can get tricky.</p>

<p>Let's say, for the sake of argument, that you (or your account
team) have been wildly over-servicing the client. Loads of hours,
lots of activity and plenty of good solid hits in the media. All,
therefore, looking good.</p>

<p>Yet it's not unheard of for the client to turn round at that
point, faced with what you feel to be an excellent set of results,
and go….&nbsp;<em>meh!</em></p>

<p>How can this be? You've worked hard - harder than hard. But the
results you've delivered are like pearls before swine.</p>

<p>All too often this boils down to one simple oversight. The
client didn't explain to you in detailed, unequivocal terms what
they wanted. Consequently, all your hard work doesn't amount to a
hill of beans.</p>

<p>For an industry busting at the seams with communications
professionals, there's a shocking amount of poor communication
going on around day-in, day-out.</p>

<p>It's not easy to look someone dead in the eye and ask them what
they want. Harder still to look someone dead in the eye and tell
them what you want.</p>

<p>But it doesn't half help with pre-empting a whole unholy host of
unfulfilled expectations further down the line. Who knows, it could
even see off some of the most common reasons for the breakdown of
such relationships:</p>

<p>- Not listening</p>

<p>- Not caring</p>

<p>- Boredom and complacency</p>

<p>- You bring me flowers, you don't sing me love songs</p>

<p>- Or burying your head in the sand and refusing to acknowledge
things aren't going as well as they should be</p>

<p>We need, as an industry, to eat our own dog food. It's not
enough to wax lyrical at clients on the merits of clear concise
communications. We need to walk the walk and, indeed, talk the
talk. Ask some frank questions…&nbsp;<em>what will success look
like</em>, for example.</p>

<p>Don't pussy-foot around the issue, get to the heart of the
matter. Once you've established what the client wants, or needs,
you can then look forward to directing all your efforts in a much
more targeted way.</p>

<p><em><strong>Sean</strong></em></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><em><img src="/media/18794/love hearts_419x314.jpg"  width="419"  height="314" alt="love hearts"/></em></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The very, very, very #Best of 10</title><link>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/11/3/the-very,-very,-very-best-of-10.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:45:35 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.octopuscomms.net/who-are-we/blog/2011/11/3/the-very,-very,-very-best-of-10.aspx</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><strong>So we're 10 years old as an agency.&nbsp; How did that
happen?</strong></p>

<p>Anyway, we'll be celebrating and partying hard tonight with our
lovely clients, former Octopedes and other assorted friends and
family who've all made the last 10 years special. Can't wait to see
some old faces and share some memories.</p>

<p>But given that the theme of our party is #Bestof10 - and being
one of the VERY lucky few to have been here from the start - I
thought I would try and think of my very own 10 best memories of
the last decade.</p>

<p>So here goes:</p>

<p><strong>1. Sept 2001:</strong> Winning our first client as
Octopus with made up business cards (while still working for
someone else - sorry, Clive) &nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>2. June 2003:</strong> Seeing our first major high
street name client win story appear in PR Week</p>

<p><strong>3. December 2005:</strong> Taking everyone to France for
a 24hour Christmas bash on a ferry</p>

<p><strong>4. Jan 2006:</strong> Winning the Google pitch and
running through the office</p>

<p><strong>5. December 2007:</strong> Mini Coopers for everyone at
the Christmas do</p>

<p><strong>6. Jan 2008:</strong> Pulling an all-nighter in Finland
for a BIG pitch and weirdly nailing it the next day</p>

<p><strong>7. June 2008:</strong> Getting a call from the team
about winning Cisco while in France and going out to buy
champagne</p>

<p><strong>8. July 2009:</strong> Seeing the house band play at the
first Roctostock Festival (our summer camp)</p>

<p><strong>9. October 2009:</strong> Finally winning our first PR
Week Award after all those nominations</p>

<p><strong>10. October 2011:</strong> Seeing the big audience
assemble for our Future<span>&nbsp;5 event</span></p>

<p>Editing this down to 10 was tough but I've tried. Looking at
this again though, most of these moments involve booze and I seem
to have a black spot over 2004 somewhere. Maybe these two facts are
linked.</p>

<p>And I've spent a joyous hour in the archives looking for some
pictoral funnies.&nbsp; Check out these beauties:</p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="/media/18326/10th birthday pics group_435x348.jpg"  width="435"  height="348" alt="bday group"/></p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">&nbsp;With more hair and in front of
Windsor Castle</p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">&nbsp;</p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="/media/18331/10th birthday pics plane_438x269.jpg"  width="438"  height="269" alt="bday plane"/></p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">Yes, Billy it's a plane, there's
loads of them in Windsor&nbsp;</p>

<p><img src="/media/18336/10th birthday pics coverage_469x376.jpg"  width="469"  height="376" alt="bday coverage"/></p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">&nbsp;Our first industry
splash!&nbsp;</p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">&nbsp;</p>

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="/media/18316/10th birthday pics billy_340x456.jpg"  width="340"  height="456" alt="10 bday billy"/></p>

<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;A young Billy looking
strategic&nbsp;</p>

<p>But my list has some big gaps, too many to mention. There's all
the great client wins we've had, all the staff get-togethers, all
the awards and gongs, the brands we've launched within the group,
the buzz and excitement of the results we get and, most
importantly, all of the talented people we've hired along the
way.</p>

<p>So until tonight, enough nostalgia.&nbsp; See you all later!</p>

<p><strong><em>Jon</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>

